- Npos_2018 - lists.testbiotech.de

Fwd: Risiko für Zukunft unseres Saatguts: Zivilgesellschaft schlägt Alarm bei EU-Agrarminister:innen
by Christoph Then 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

I guess we promote it on Twitter ... Dagmar is quoted, very good initiative. -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: Risiko für Zukunft unseres Saatguts: Zivilgesellschaft schlägt Alarm bei EU-Agrarminister:innen Datum: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 07:00:15 +0000 Von: Global 2000 Presse <presse(a)global2000.at> Antwort an: presse(a)global2000.at An: info(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org *Risiko für die Zukunft unseres Saatguts:* *Zivilgesellschaft schlägt Alarm bei EU-Agrarminister:innen* *Appell: Neue Gentechnik regulieren und Patentschlupflöcher reparieren!* (c) GLOBAL 2000 / Mira Nograsek /Brüssel/Wien, am 17. November 2023 –/ Im Vorfeld des _EU-Agrarrats_ <https://hwr6spdq.r.eu-central-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.consilium.eu…> am 20. November schlagen internationale Organisationen Alarm bei den Agrarminister:innen: „Wir sind zutiefst besorgt über die wachsende Flut von Patentanträgen für Neue Gentechnik-Saatgut und NGT-Pflanzen in Europa. Diese unkontrollierte Entwicklung birgt negative Auswirkungen auf Züchter:innen, Bäuer:innen und die Lebensmittelproduktion. *Wir stehen an einem entscheidenden Punkt, an dem wir die Weichen für die Zukunft unserer Landwirtschaft und biologische Vielfalt stellen müssen. Landwirtschaftsminister Totschnig ist jetzt gefordert, Allianzen mit anderen EU-Agrarminister:innen zu schmieden, um diese gefährlichen Entwicklungen für Österreichs Landwirtschaft abzuwenden!*“, so die Organisationen ARCHE NOAH, der Kleinbäuer:innenverband Europäische Koordination Vía Campesina, Friends of the Earth Europe, Greenpeace, Corporate Europe Observatory, FIAN International, ENGA – European Non-GMO Industry Association, NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! und GLOBAL 2000. Der _Appell_ <https://hwr6spdq.r.eu-central-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.global2000.a…> formuliert zwei konkrete Forderungen: * Um das Verbot von Patenten auf konventionelles Saatgut und Pflanzen gemäß EU-Patentrecht sicherzustellen, ist es notwendig, den Begriff "im Wesentlichen biologische Verfahren" klar zu definieren und damit den Anwendungsbereich von Patenten auf technische Verfahren einzuschränken. * Im Hinblick auf Neue Gentechnik sind die Agrarminister:innen aufgefordert, den Deregulierungsprozess zu stoppen, da die Auswirkungen von Patenten auf Saatgut bisher nicht evaluiert wurden und die damit verbundenen Probleme ignoriert werden. "Der von der EU-Kommission vorgeschlagene Bericht über die Auswirkungen der Patente auf NGT-Pflanzen bis 2026 reicht nicht aus, um das Problem zu lösen und die offenen Fragestellungen zu Patenten und Neuer Gentechnik zu beantworten. Das wäre zu wenig und zu spät”, kritisiert *Brigitte Reisenberger, GLOBAL 2000 Gentechniksprecherin*. Ein akutes Problem besteht bereits jetzt darin, dass die derzeitige Auslegung des europäischen Patentrechts nicht ausreicht, um Patente auf konventionelle Züchtungen zu verhindern. Die Agrarindustrie nutzt diese Schlupflöcher im Patentrecht und weitet sie gezielt von gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen auf konventionell gezüchtete Pflanzen aus. Der Gesetzesentwurf zur Neuen Gentechnik würde diesen Missbrauch des europäischen Patentrechts noch weiter treiben und zu einer Flut von patentiertem Saatgut in der EU führen. “Die Industrie meldet Patente auf NGT-Produkte an und treibt gleichzeitig die Deregulierung von Neuer Gentechnik voran, um verpflichtende Zulassungsverfahren, Risikobewertung sowie Rückverfolgbarkeit und Kennzeichnung von gentechnisch verändertem Saatgut und Lebensmitteln abzuschaffen”, verweist *Brigitte Reisenberger, von GLOBAL 2000 *auf die besorgniserregende Strategie der Agrarkonzerne, die Unterschiede von konventionell gezüchteten Pflanzen und NGT-Produkten zu verwischen. „Wenn sich die Agrarkonzerne durchsetzen, werden wir in der konventionellen und bäuerlichen Züchtung mit patentiertem Saatgut enden und ohne Zulassungsverfahren für gentechnisch veränderte Pflanzen – eine lose-lose-Situation für kleine und mittlere Züchter:innen, Landwirt:innen, Lebensmittelhersteller:innen und die Konsument:innen”, sagt *Dagmar Urban von ARCHE NOAH*. “Diese gefährliche Entwicklung führt zu erhöhten Kosten, Rechtsunsicherheiten und neuen Abhängigkeiten, insbesondere für Bäuer:innen und kleinere Züchter:innen. Stattdessen brauchen wir die Stärkung der vielen agrarökologischen Alternativen!”, so *Biobäuerin Maria Vogt von der ÖBV-Via Campesina Austria*. *„Es liegt nun in den Händen der Agrarminister:innen mit schnellen, mutigen Schritten die Probleme mit Patenten und Neuer Gentechnik anzugehen und Lösungen zu finden. Ihr aktiver Einsatz ist entscheidend“*, betonen die Initiator:innen des Appells. PDF, 227 KB 2023-11-16-NGT-Patents-on-NGT-Statement-EN.pdf Appell an EU-Agrarminister:innen (englisch) <https://hwr6spdq.r.eu-central-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fmedia-contact-at…> IMAGE, 1 MB Aktionsfoto_Patentiert_(c)GLOBAL2000_Mira-Nograsek.jpg (c) GLOBAL 2000 / Mira Nograsek <https://hwr6spdq.r.eu-central-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fmedia-contact-at…> *Rückfragehinweise:* Selina Englmayer, GLOBAL 2000 Pressesprecherin, +43 699 14 2000 26, _selina.englmayer(a)global2000.at_ <mailto:selina.englmayer@global2000.at> Franziskus Forster, ÖBV-Via Campesina Austria, +43 650 68 888 69, _franziskus.forster(a)viacampesina.at_ <mailto:franziskus.forster@viacampesina.at> Axel Grunt, ARCHE NOAH, +43 680 2379245, _axel.grunt(a)arche-noah.at_ <mailto:axel.grunt@arche-noah.at> Sollten Sie diese oder ähnliche Zusendungen nicht mehr erhalten wollen, antworten Sie bitte auf dieses E-Mail.

2 1

Workshop No patents on seeds! Nordic countries 27 Nov.
by Johanna Eckhardt 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

Dear all, since we didn't have a lot of registrations for the workshop in Copenhagen, we switched the format to an online event and want to invite all Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland). See the final program attached. In case you have suggestions who we could invite from those countries, please let us know. It is aimed to experts/politicians/media and not so much to organisations. So far we'll invite * Erlings contacts * Admin.Council representatives * MEPs from ENVI / AGRI * Elin / Bell from Norway Unfortunately we don't have good contacts to the ministries. And the time frame is a bit short. You are welcome to join. If interested, let me know and I'll send you the link. Kind regards, Johanna Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed

2 1

Euroseeds pressrelease patents and NGT
by Francois Meienberg 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

In the case ou have not already seen it : The pressrelease by Euroseeds on patents and NGT : https://euroseeds.eu/app/uploads/2023/11/23.0759-Euroseeds-statement-on-IP-… Best François

1 0

WG: [New-gm-eur] Fwd: [gpeu-staff] Gene-editing sprint may run out of road
by ARCHE NOAH Katherine Dolan 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

Dear all, It is good to see that the reporting on the joint letter on patents to Agriculture Ministers in POLITICO focusses on the issue of patents on conventional breeding and the changes that are necessary to stop them – see below in yellow. Thank you to Dagmar and Christoph for your work on this. I lost track of whether/when a meeting with DG Grow will take place, but hopefully this prominent reporting will prompt them to take the issue a bit more seriously. Best, Katherine Von: New-gm-eur <new-gm-eur-bounces(a)lists.corporateeurope.org> Im Auftrag von Eva Corral via New-gm-eur Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2023 08:45 An: New-gm Eur <new-gm-eur(a)lists.corporateeurope.org> Betreff: [New-gm-eur] Fwd: [gpeu-staff] Gene-editing sprint may run out of road Good morning, FYI, see POLITICO article on new GMOs and Council discussions (Spanish Presidency), below. Have a nice day, Eva ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: 'POLITICO Pro Morning Agri & Food Europe' via gpeu-staff-group <gpeu-staff-group(a)greenpeace.org<mailto:gpeu-staff-group@greenpeace.org>> Date: Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 7:01 AM Subject: [gpeu-staff] Gene-editing sprint may run out of road To: <mark.breddy(a)greenpeace.org<mailto:mark.breddy@greenpeace.org>> Presented by Fertilizers Europe By BARTOSZ BRZEZIŃSKI with PAULA ANDRÉS, DOUGLAS BUSVINE, CAMILLE GIJS and LOUISE GUILLOT SNEAK PEEK — A general approach among EU ministers on gene-editing rules could be "difficult" to achieve before the end of the Spanish presidency. — The EU-Mercosur trade deal will be "surgically adjusted," the EU's top negotiator says. — Civil society and farmers push for a revision of EU patent law over new gene-edited seeds. Welcome to Morning Agri | Send tips, comments and scoopy documents to: bbrzezinski(a)politico.eu<mailto:bbrzezinski@politico.eu> and pandres(a)politico.eu<mailto:pandres@politico.eu> | Find us on X @ThisIsBartosz and @paulandresr_, and now on Bluesky too at @thisisbartosz.bsky.social and @paulandres.bsky.social. DRIVING THE DAY GENERAL APPROACH 'DIFFICULT' WITHIN SPANISH PRESIDENCY: The Spanish presidency had hoped to agree a general approach among member states on the new gene-editing (NGTs) rules proposal, which initially enjoyed broad support. That ambition has now shrunk to reaching “a solid agreement,” said Fernando Miranda Sotillos from the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture and Food during POLITICO’s Sustainable Future Week on Wednesday. “It’s going to be difficult to get a general approach in the Council,” he said, adding that the proposal – which the Commission submitted in July — came “late” to the presidency. Concerns persist: Miranda Sotillos noted ongoing concerns regarding the relaxation of EU rules on certain gene-edited organisms and seeds — such as coexistence with organic farming; the patentability of such seeds; and a verification process that equates some gene-edited crops (category 1) with conventional ones. Fighting the clock: “We need more time to speak broadly with member states and the [public] opinion in order to improve the proposal,” he added. But: The Spanish official defended the Commission’s proposal as “balanced,” and highlighted the sustainability benefits of these “new varieties,” such as adaptability to climate change and reduced use of pesticides. Doubling down: Miranda Sotillos called on the bloc to “make use of this opportunity” and avoid making “the same mistakes we committed with the genetically-modified organisms (GMO) regulation” — including a mistaken focus on varieties tolerant to certain herbicides. “If we fail in providing this legal framework," he added, "we are going to stay behind what is going on in the U.S. and the U.K.” — the latter having passed a Genetic Technology Act earlier this year. TRADE COMMISSION PLAYS DOWN MERCOSUR CHANGES AS ‘SURGICAL': Despite hurdles on both sides, the Commission is not reopening the EU-Mercosur agreement but is instead making “surgical adjustments,” the top EU negotiator on the deal said. “It is important that we avoid this word that everything be reopened because this will lead to a downward spiral," said Rupert Schlegelmilch, director of the Americas department at the Commission’s trade directorate at an event on Wednesday. "I don't like the word ‘reopening,' I would really talk about ‘surgical adjustments’ to really take into account what happened between 2019 and 2023.” Sure about that? Trade diplomats will be digging deeper today into what the Commission meant when it said last week that the state of current negotiations means that Brussels is no longer in a scenario where there won’t be changes to the original political agreement struck in 2019. Public procurement: As to whether the deal would need to be reopened if the health sector were exempted from the public procurement provisions of the current agreement — as Brazil requested — Schlegelmilch said this was “under discussion,” during a webinar hosted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE). Not during this mandate: The Commission official also said that even if the two sides reached an agreement under Brazil's Mercosur presidency (which ends December 7), it would be up to the next Parliament to vote on the deal, "unless a miracle happens." Further apart: Brazil Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira warned that his country can’t accept the current deforestation conditions. “We cannot accept restrictions and sanctions imposed on the Mercosur side," he told our colleague Suzanne Lynch in Brasília. "If this is not negotiable, then we will not have a deal. We believe that our system of monitoring is very reliable, very good and it has to be accepted by the European Union.” Vieira said Brazil has already made substantial progress on that front under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Suzanne's full story is here. Latin America vs EU at WTO: A group of Latin American countries isn’t happy about new EU rules to prevent the import of commodities driving deforestation — and they want the rest of the world to know it. Ahead of today’s meeting of the WTO's Trade and Environment Committee, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru circulated a 10-page document quizzing the EU on the regulation and its future implementation. They’re particularly worried about how this “unilateral rule” will affect trade for developing countries, especially as it's expected to “generate higher costs or barriers to trade” for small producers. Main beefs: The group criticized the fact that the EU regulation will have a “unilateral rating” of the level of deforestation risk; short deadlines to comply; and that “many aspects” of the legislation “are not clear to date,” making it difficult for them to prepare. MORE GENE-EDITING PARLIAMENT’S DEADLINE FOR AMENDMENTS: ENVI lawmakers had until Wednesday to submit their amendments to the draft report of lead negotiator Jessica Polfjärd (EPP) — with a committee vote expected on January 11. Remember: Polfjärd's draft proposes lifting a ban on the use of NGT crops in organic farming, and removing a labeling requirement for NGT seeds, among other changes to the Commission’s original proposal. 150 wishes: Socialist shadow rapporteur Christophe Clergeau has tabled nearly 150 amendments to the draft report. The main changes Clergeau requested include: a mandatory risk assessment before placing seeds on the market, as well as environmental monitoring; compulsory labeling and traceability requirements; restrictions on the patentability of new seeds; and a new approach to verifying whether NGT plants are equivalent to conventional ones. CIVIL SOCIETY AND FARMERS WANT REVISED PATENT LAW: Farmer organization La Via Campesina and NGO Greenpeace — among others — are asking agriculture ministers to pressure the Commission and the European Patent Office to clarify aspects of Europe's patent law in a letter to be sent this morning. Blurred lines: According to the letter, the current interpretation of patent law is insufficient to stop patents from being obtained on conventional breeding. “We are particularly concerned that the strategy of blurring the differences between plants obtained by conventional breeding and those obtained by genetic engineering are used by industry in two contexts: In filing patents as well as in their efforts to push to deregulate NGT organisms,” it says. This would mean that farmers and traditional breeders in particular faced increased costs, legal uncertainties and new dependencies. Demands: For this reason, the signatories ask that EU patent law elucidate a clear interpretation of "essentially biological processes," and that the scope of patents on NGT plants not impact conventional seeds “as it is the case today.” 2026 PLEDGE: To address the general concerns over patents, the Commission proposed to publish a market analysis by 2026. However, this is “too little, too late” for civil society, farmers groups and some member states. Given the importance of the issue, Finland and Lithuania want the report to be presented sooner than 2026. Moreover, Hungary has asked specific questions such as what assurances the Commission can provide that patents will not adversely affect small breeders, farmers and producers. UKRAINE RUSSIA’S PLAN TO WEAPONIZE UKRAINIAN GRAIN: Ahead of its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia planned to pillage and weaponize more than $1 billion worth of the country's grain annually, according to a report released today by international human rights law firm Global Rights Compliance. Open source: The investigation used cutting-edge open-source research, analysis and verification of photographs, videos, public statements by officials, and other digital data, all collected between December 2021 and July 2023. Focus: It focused on the occupied grain-rich regions of Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia, where the mass extraction of grain was first reported in March 2022. On capturing territory, Russian forces seized grain facilities from Ukrainian farmers and corporations, commandeered nearby transport networks, and whisked the stolen Ukrainian grain to Russia. War crimes dossier: Evidence from the report will be included in a starvation war crimes dossier that will eventually be submitted to the International Criminal Court. It reveals “an insidious backdrop whereby Russia has sought to dismantle Ukraine’s agricultural outputs, destroy livelihoods, and compound a global food crisis,” said Catriona Murdoch, partner and head of starvation portfolio at Global Rights Compliance. Systematic weaponization: Yousuf Syed Khan, senior lawyer at Global Rights Compliance, added: “The highly systematized weaponization of Ukraine's grain that we are documenting is unprecedented in modern history, and has involved extremely intricate pre-planning.” FOOD INFLATION PRICE INFLATION TO EASE NEXT YEAR: Global food commodity prices are set to fall in 2024 after three years of record highs caused by wars, adverse weather, and rising energy and input costs, according to Rabobank's annual assessment. The prices of key foods such as sugar, coffee, corn and soybeans are expected to decrease. Demand to stay weak: Despite relief on prices and availability, the bank still predicts that demand will remain weak as consumers continue to deal with economic challenges, including high inflation and interest rates. Wheat volatility: In other key markets, such as wheat, uncertainty will persist due to climate change impacts and potential restrictions on Russian exports. Russia’s 2024 harvest will likely remain above 87 million metric tons, subject to weather and export restrictions, according to the bank. Moscow's war in Ukraine will also continue to affect production and will lead to a shrinking exportable surplus. AGRICULTURAL RESERVE AGRI LAWMAKERS DISCUSS CRISIS BUDGET: AGRI MEPs will discuss the agricultural reserve this morning, a €450 million annual emergency budget within EU farming funds that has already been used to aid member states after climate disasters and market disturbances. An exchange of views with the Commission “on lessons learnt and ways forward” to improve use the reserve will kick off after the committee votes at around 9:30 a.m. CLIMATE CHANGE 5 WAYS CLIMATE CHANGE WILL KILL US: The latest Lancet Countdown report on health and climate change details the dire health consequences of rising temperatures and increasing energy emissions, beyond immediate threats to life from disasters such as megafires and floods. “There is an enormous human cost to inaction, and we can’t afford this level of disengagement — we are paying in lives,” said Marina Romanello, executive director of Lancet Countdown at University College London. Among the main health threats: lack of food. The report estimates that heat waves alone could add 524 million people to the ranks of those experiencing moderate to severe food insecurity by the 2041–2060 period. Read more from our health colleague Ashleigh. Presented by Fertilizers Europe [Pro Morning Agriculture & Food] By BARTOSZ BRZEZIŃSKI with PAULA ANDRÉS, DOUGLAS BUSVINE, CAMILLE GIJS and LOUISE GUILLOT PRESENTED BY [Fertilizers Europe] [https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/headphones2_25.png]View in your browser or listen to audio<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> SNEAK PEEK — A general approach among EU ministers on gene-editing rules could be “difficult” to achieve before the end of the Spanish presidency. — The EU-Mercosur trade deal will be “surgically adjusted,” the EU’s top negotiator says. — Civil society and farmers push for a revision of EU patent law over new gene-edited seeds. Welcome to Morning Agri | Send tips, comments and scoopy documents to: bbrzezinski(a)politico.eu<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> and pandres(a)politico.eu<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> | Find us on X @ThisIsBartosz<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> and @paulandresr_<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>, and now on Bluesky too at @thisisbartosz.bsky.social<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> and @paulandres.bsky.social<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>. DRIVING THE DAY GENERAL APPROACH ‘DIFFICULT’ WITHIN SPANISH PRESIDENCY: The Spanish presidency had hoped to agree a general approach among member states on the new gene-editing (NGTs<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>) rules proposal, which initially enjoyed broad support. That ambition has now shrunk to reaching “a solid agreement,” said Fernando Miranda Sotillos from the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture and Food during POLITICO’s Sustainable Future Week<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> on Wednesday. “It’s going to be difficult to get a general approach in the Council,” he said, adding that the proposal – which the Commission submitted in July — came “late” to the presidency. Concerns persist: Miranda Sotillos noted ongoing concerns regarding the relaxation of EU rules on certain gene-edited organisms and seeds — such as coexistence with organic farming; the patentability of such seeds; and a verification process that equates some gene-edited crops (category 1) with conventional ones. Fighting the clock: “We need more time to speak broadly with member states and the [public] opinion in order to improve the proposal,” he added. But: The Spanish official defended the Commission’s proposal as “balanced,” and highlighted the sustainability benefits of these “new varieties,” such as adaptability to climate change and reduced use of pesticides. Doubling down: Miranda Sotillos called on the bloc to “make use of this opportunity” and avoid making “the same mistakes we committed with the genetically-modified organisms (GMO) regulation” — including a mistaken focus on varieties tolerant to certain herbicides. “If we fail in providing this legal framework,” he added, “we are going to stay behind what is going on in the U.S. and the U.K.” — the latter having passed a Genetic Technology Act earlier this year. [https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/09/Plant-nutrition-and-s…]<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> TRADE COMMISSION PLAYS DOWN MERCOSUR CHANGES AS ‘SURGICAL’: Despite hurdles on both sides, the Commission is not reopening the EU-Mercosur agreement but is instead making “surgical adjustments,” the top EU negotiator on the deal said. “It is important that we avoid this word that everything be reopened because this will lead to a downward spiral,” said Rupert Schlegelmilch, director of the Americas department at the Commission’s trade directorate at an event<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> on Wednesday. “I don’t like the word ‘reopening,’ I would really talk about ‘surgical adjustments’ to really take into account what happened between 2019 and 2023.” Sure about that? Trade diplomats will be digging deeper today into what the Commission meant<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> when it said last week that the state of current negotiations means that Brussels is no longer in a scenario where there won’t be changes to the original political agreement struck in 2019. Public procurement: As to whether the deal would need to be reopened if the health sector were exempted from the public procurement provisions of the current agreement — as Brazil requested — Schlegelmilch said this was “under discussion,” during a webinar hosted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE). Not during this mandate: The Commission official also said that even if the two sides reached an agreement under Brazil’s Mercosur presidency (which ends December 7), it would be up to the next Parliament to vote on the deal, “unless a miracle happens.” Further apart: Brazil Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira warned that his country can’t accept the current deforestation conditions. “We cannot accept restrictions and sanctions imposed on the Mercosur side,” he told our colleague Suzanne Lynch in Brasília. “If this is not negotiable, then we will not have a deal. We believe that our system of monitoring is very reliable, very good and it has to be accepted by the European Union.” Vieira said Brazil has already made substantial progress on that front under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Suzanne’s full story is here<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>. Latin America vs EU at WTO: A group of Latin American countries isn’t happy about new EU rules to prevent the import of commodities driving deforestation — and they want the rest of the world to know it. Ahead of today’s meeting<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> of the WTO’s Trade and Environment Committee, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru circulated a 10-page document<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> quizzing the EU on the regulation and its future implementation. They’re particularly worried about how this “unilateral rule” will affect trade for developing countries, especially as it’s expected to “generate higher costs or barriers to trade” for small producers. Main beefs: The group criticized the fact that the EU regulation will have a “unilateral rating” of the level of deforestation risk; short deadlines to comply; and that “many aspects” of the legislation “are not clear to date,” making it difficult for them to prepare. **A message from Fertilizers Europe: Did you know<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>, farmland covers almost 40% of the European territory? And that out of the 9.1 million European farms, 2.9 million are in Romania? Farm structure, climate and soil condition vary significantly across Europe. Discover how the fertilizers industry is helping farmers achieve 70% nutrient use efficiency by 2030<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>.** MORE GENE-EDITING PARLIAMENT’S DEADLINE FOR AMENDMENTS: ENVI lawmakers had until Wednesday to submit their amendments to the draft report of lead negotiator Jessica Polfjärd (EPP) — with a committee vote expected on January 11. Remember: Polfjärd’s draft proposes lifting a ban on the use of NGT crops in organic farming, and removing a labeling requirement for NGT seeds, among other changes to the Commission’s original proposal<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>. 150 wishes: Socialist shadow rapporteur Christophe Clergeau has tabled nearly 150 amendments to the draft report. The main changes Clergeau requested include<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>: a mandatory risk assessment before placing seeds on the market, as well as environmental monitoring; compulsory labeling and traceability requirements; restrictions on the patentability of new seeds; and a new approach to verifying whether NGT plants are equivalent to conventional ones. CIVIL SOCIETY AND FARMERS WANT REVISED PATENT LAW: Farmer organization La Via Campesina and NGO Greenpeace — among others — are asking agriculture ministers to pressure the Commission and the European Patent Office to clarify aspects of Europe’s patent law in a letter<https://dmp.politico.eu/?email=mark.breddy@greenpeace.org&destination=https…> to be sent this morning. Blurred lines: According to the letter, the current interpretation of patent law is insufficient to stop patents from being obtained on conventional breeding. “We are particularly concerned that the strategy of blurring the differences between plants obtained by conventional breeding and those obtained by genetic engineering are used by industry in two contexts: In filing patents as well as in their efforts to push to deregulate NGT organisms,” it says. This would mean that farmers and traditional breeders in particular faced increased costs, legal uncertainties and new dependencies. Demands: For this reason, the signatories ask that EU patent law elucidate a clear interpretation of “essentially biological processes,” and that the scope of patents on NGT plants not impact conventional seeds “as it is the case today.” 2026 PLEDGE: To address the general concerns over patents, the Commission proposed to publish a market analysis by 2026. However, this is “too little, too late” for civil society, farmers groups and some member states<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>. Given the importance of the issue, Finland and Lithuania want the report to be presented sooner than 2026. Moreover, Hungary has asked specific questions such as what assurances the Commission can provide that patents will not adversely affect small breeders, farmers and producers. **POLITICO’s Global Playbook takes you behind the scenes at COP. As part of the major global events that shape international policy, our newsletter delivers daily reporting on green policy shifts taking place at COP28. Want to get them in your inbox? Sign up here<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>.** UKRAINE RUSSIA’S PLAN TO WEAPONIZE UKRAINIAN GRAIN: Ahead of its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia planned to pillage and weaponize more than $1 billion worth of the country’s grain annually, according to a report released today by international human rights law firm Global Rights Compliance<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…>. Open source: The investigation used cutting-edge open-source research, analysis and verification of photographs, videos, public statements by officials, and other digital data, all collected between December 2021 and July 2023. Focus: It focused on the occupied grain-rich regions of Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia, where the mass extraction of grain was first reported in March 2022. On capturing territory, Russian forces seized grain facilities from Ukrainian farmers and corporations, commandeered nearby transport networks, and whisked the stolen Ukrainian grain to Russia. War crimes dossier: Evidence from the report will be included in a starvation war crimes dossier that will eventually be submitted to the International Criminal Court. It reveals “an insidious backdrop whereby Russia has sought to dismantle Ukraine’s agricultural outputs, destroy livelihoods, and compound a global food crisis,” said Catriona Murdoch, partner and head of starvation portfolio at Global Rights Compliance. Systematic weaponization: Yousuf Syed Khan, senior lawyer at Global Rights Compliance, added: “The highly systematized weaponization of Ukraine’s grain that we are documenting is unprecedented in modern history, and has involved extremely intricate pre-planning.” FOOD INFLATION PRICE INFLATION TO EASE NEXT YEAR: Global food commodity prices are set to fall in 2024 after three years of record highs caused by wars, adverse weather, and rising energy and input costs, according to Rabobank’s annual assessment. The prices of key foods such as sugar, coffee, corn and soybeans are expected to decrease. Demand to stay weak: Despite relief on prices and availability, the bank still predicts that demand will remain weak as consumers continue to deal with economic challenges, including high inflation and interest rates. Wheat volatility: In other key markets, such as wheat, uncertainty will persist due to climate change impacts and potential restrictions on Russian exports. Russia’s 2024 harvest will likely remain above 87 million metric tons, subject to weather and export restrictions, according to the bank. Moscow’s war in Ukraine will also continue to affect production and will lead to a shrinking exportable surplus. AGRICULTURAL RESERVE AGRI LAWMAKERS DISCUSS CRISIS BUDGET: AGRI MEPs will discuss the agricultural reserve this morning, a €450 million annual emergency budget within EU farming funds that has already been used to aid member states after climate disasters and market disturbances. An exchange of views with the Commission “on lessons learnt and ways forward” to improve use the reserve will kick off<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> after the committee votes at around 9:30 a.m. CLIMATE CHANGE 5 WAYS CLIMATE CHANGE WILL KILL US: The latest Lancet Countdown report<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> on health and climate change details the dire health consequences of rising temperatures and increasing energy emissions, beyond immediate threats to life from disasters such as megafires and floods. “There is an enormous human cost to inaction, and we can’t afford this level of disengagement — we are paying in lives,” said Marina Romanello, executive director of Lancet Countdown at University College London. Among the main health threats: lack of food. The report estimates that heat waves alone could add 524 million people to the ranks of those experiencing moderate to severe food insecurity by the 2041–2060 period. Read more<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> from our health colleague Ashleigh. **A message from Fertilizers Europe: Soil is a complex matter, composed of a mixture of minerals, organic matter, gases, liquids and countless organisms. Soils are highly diverse in their characteristics, nutrient content and ecosystem services provided, that are strictly linked to the functions of the soil itself. Assessing soil health goes beyond a single parameter<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdmp.politico.eu%2F%3F…> and it requires a comprehensive index that incorporates various indicators to provide a more complete picture of the soil's overall health and quality. This assessment should also consider soil function, encompassing factors like nutrient levels, organic matter content, pH, microbial activity, physical structure, and the soil's ability to support plant growth and ecosystem services. By integrating these diverse aspects, we can gain a deeper understanding of soil health, which is crucial for making informed decisions in agriculture and environmental management.** Headlines Here’s a recap of yesterday’s news, along with Pro articles and alerts from overnight. Ten more years: Emmanuel Macron’s broken glyphosate promise<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpro.politico.eu%2Fnew…> Despite pledging to ban the herbicide, France is set to abstain in an EU vote, meaning it will probably survive at least another 10 years. By Bartosz Brzeziński · Nov 15, 2023, 7:32 PM EU and Chile set to sign association accord on December 21<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpro.politico.eu%2Fnew…> By Camille Gijs · Nov 15, 2023, 4:49 PM Hunters press von der Leyen to revise rules for shooting wolves<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpro.politico.eu%2Fnew…> Group urges European Commission to ‘move quickly.’ By Louise Guillot · Nov 15, 2023, 1:35 PM Brazil threatens no deal on Mercosur over deforestation rules<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpro.politico.eu%2Fnew…> Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira tells POLITICO that Brazil cannot accept conditions on deforestation. By Suzanne Lynch · Nov 15, 2023, 1:15 PM Hands off our Camembert! France kicks up a stink over draft EU recycling law<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpro.politico.eu%2Fnew…> Brussels risks another ‘bendy banana’ PR disaster over single-use packaging. By Jakob Hanke Vela, Claudia Chiappa · Nov 15, 2023, 9:16 AM This email alert has been sent for your exclusive use as a POLITICO Pro subscriber. Forwarding or reproducing the newsletter without the express, written permission of POLITICO Pro is a violation of the POLITICO Pro license agreement. This email was sent to mark.breddy(a)greenpeace.org<mailto:mark.breddy@greenpeace.org> Unsubscribe<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fapi.politico.eu%2Funs…> Update settings<https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpro.politico.eu%2Fset…> POLITICO SRL · Rue de la Loi 62 · Brussels 1040 · Belgium [https://y3r710.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/I0/0102018bd6b892e1-d42e9a5c-7574-48…] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gpeu-staff-group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gpeu-staff-group+unsubscribe(a)greenpeace.org<mailto:gpeu-staff-group+unsubscribe@greenpeace.org>. -- Eva Corral GMO/Glyphosate campaigner – Greenpeace European Unit 199 rue Belliard, 1040 Brussels<https://www.google.be/maps/place/Greenpeace+European+Unit/@50.8395824,4.382…> Mobile/Signal: +32 (0)479 601289 www.greenpeace.eu<http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/> www.twitter.com/GreenpeaceEU<http://www.twitter.com/GreenpeaceEU> Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning network that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to protect and conserve the environment and to promote peace. We do not accept donations from governments, the EU, businesses or political parties. We have over three million supporters and offices in more than 55 countries. EU Transparency Register: 9832909575-41<http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyis…>

4 3

Re: [Npos_2018] IMPORTANT: Meeting of members 2024
by Johanna Eckhardt 15 Nov '23

15 Nov '23

.please keep in mind that 31 March is Easter Sunday - so some of the proposed dates are around Easter. Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed Von: Johanna Eckhardt <johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. November 2023 15:41 An: 'npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de' <npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de> Betreff: IMPORTANT: Meeting of members 2024 Dear all, let's fix a date for our next meeting of members end of March/beginning of April 2024. We plan for a one day meeting in Munich from around 10h-17h. Please let me know if that works for you or if you have other suggestions. Here is a poll: https://dud-poll.inf.tu-dresden.de/uRtvdGxtZw/ Please fill it out until 22 Nov / 10h CET. If you have any preferences of dates that I should keep in mind, just let me know. Kind regards, Johanna Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed

1 0

IMPORTANT: Meeting of members 2024
by Johanna Eckhardt 15 Nov '23

15 Nov '23

Dear all, let's fix a date for our next meeting of members end of March/beginning of April 2024. We plan for a one day meeting in Munich from around 10h-17h. Please let me know if that works for you or if you have other suggestions. Here is a poll: https://dud-poll.inf.tu-dresden.de/uRtvdGxtZw/ Please fill it out until 22 Nov / 10h CET. If you have any preferences of dates that I should keep in mind, just let me know. Kind regards, Johanna Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed

1 0

Conference call 6 nov 2023 - Minutes
by Johanna Eckhardt 15 Nov '23

15 Nov '23

Dear all, I just sent you the minutes of last week's conference call via Proton: www.proton.me <http://www.proton.me> Kind regards, Johanna Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed

1 0

Update NL
by Johanna Eckhardt 13 Nov '23

13 Nov '23

Dear Nout, thanks for the update. Didn't the NL resolution ask for a clear prohibition of patents on conventional breeding? But the EC study planned for 2026 (on the impact of plant patents) is in the frame of the NGT regulation. So no direct link, right? As far as I understood (from Dagmar) the process of the study can't really be speeded up, because they have to consult stakeholders, etc. and this takes time. The only thing that can be asked is to postpone the NGT regulation until having more info on the consequences. Great if you can do a follow up - and that the topic is in the election program. On the EPO level, the EPO will present a report on biopatents at the Committee on Patent Law on 16 Nov. that will most probably be discussed at the Admin. Council meeting on 13/14 Dec. We will most probably use this to contact the member states before the Admin Council. Kind regards, Johanna Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed Von: Nout van der Vaart <nout.vandervaart(a)oxfamnovib.nl> Gesendet: Montag, 6. November 2023 16:53 An: Johanna Eckhardt <johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org>; npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de Betreff: RE: [Npos_2018] IMPORTANT: Conference call November Hi all, Sorry for my absence in the call, I couldn't make it due to personal circumstances. I would like to share one update though: The Dutch Minister of Agriculture - pushed for by Parliament (following up on the June 8 resolution <https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/moties/detail?id=2023Z10491&did=202 3D25147> that called upon him to work together with EU colleagues to make the EPO stop issuing patents on conventionally bred plants) - during the Sept 5 EU Informal Council <https://spanish-presidency.consilium.europa.eu/en/events/informal-ministeri al-meeting-on-agriculture-3-59/> (of Agricultural ministers) meeting, asked for the expedition of a EC study on this topic that was originally planned for 2026. With this, he accounts for 'having given follow up to the said resolution'. Although this is a somewhat positive step by the Dutch Ag minister, it's obviously not enough, nor a fully satisfying move. Therefore I'm planning to reach out to the MP (of the Christian Reformist Party <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reformed_Political_Party> ) who submitted the resolution to discuss possible follow up steps on this topic. Interesting thing is that they included the enforcement of the EU prohibition on patenting conventionally bred plants in their election program (Dutch parliamentary elections taking place on Nov 22). Perhaps the above is good to know for organizations in this network working on the same. One might consider following up with other European country Ag ministries/EU delegations to (at least) indeed expedite the EC study, or, better, to give more ambitious follow up on keeping the EPO from further issuing patents on plants. Best, Nout From: Npos_2018 <npos_2018-bounces(a)testbiotech.de <mailto:npos_2018-bounces@testbiotech.de> > On Behalf Of Johanna Eckhardt Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 8:03 PM To: npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de <mailto:npos_2018@testbiotech.de> Subject: [Npos_2018] IMPORTANT: Conference call November Dear all, please find below the Zoom details for the English and the German call as well as the agenda. Attached the updated NPOS calendar. Kind regards, Johanna English call: Monday, 6 November 15h-16.30h CET. Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83561913189?pwd=UWpLa2RSSzYxOTlHVGIyL1FmWjlZQT09 Meeting ID: 835 6191 3189 Passcode: 039122 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kLpdTGOFH German call: Tuesday, 7 November 10h-11.30h CET Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87333735242?pwd=Q0R2SGEwV1hkUlFyby9ZUjN6SXhEdz09 Meeting ID: 873 3373 5242 Passcode: 791374 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kccVu94iG Agenda 1. Updates 1.1. from countries / member organisations * LLD forum Ireland /27.10. patent workshop (Katherine?) 1.2. NPOS * demonstration in Munich on 5 October * NGT-Conference Vienna 11 October * meeting with COM on 7 November 2. Next steps 2.1. 27 Nov. / patent event in Denmark 2.2. Admin. Council meeting 13/14 December * discussion about patents? * activity? 2.3. Campaign seed stickers 2024 3. Other 3.1. NGTs and patents 3.2. regulation on plant reproductive material and patents 3.3. Meeting of members 2024, date 3.4. Next conference call Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed Von: Npos_2018 <npos_2018-bounces(a)testbiotech.de <mailto:npos_2018-bounces@testbiotech.de> > Im Auftrag von Johanna Eckhardt Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2023 21:25 An: npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de <mailto:npos_2018@testbiotech.de> Betreff: [Npos_2018] Conference call November Dear all, let's fix our next conference call for Monday, 6 November 15h-16.30h CET. Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83561913189?pwd=UWpLa2RSSzYxOTlHVGIyL1FmWjlZQT09 Meeting ID: 835 6191 3189 Passcode: 039122 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kLpdTGOFH Kind regards, Johanna Mag. Johanna ECKHARDT Project Coordination Tel. +43 680 21 26 343 johanna.eckhardt(a)no-patents-on-seeds.org <mailto:johanna.eckhardt@no-patents-on-seeds.org> NO PATENTS ON SEEDS! <http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/> www.no-patents-on-seeds.org <http://www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds> www.facebook.com/nopatentsonseeds <http://www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed> www.twitter.com/nopatentsonseed

3 2

New version - Proposal: NPOS to sign letter to EU Agri Ministers?
by ARCHE NOAH Dagmar Urban 13 Nov '23

13 Nov '23

Dear all, there is a new version of the letter to the EU Agri ministers after a few more comments and discussions (especially from Via Campesina and Greenpeace), you can find the very final version here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wx1KqluPUcUHOxIRf7lLVw-hu0h0RfOFjyLd5AD… If anyone disagrees with signing the new version as NPOS please write to the list until Wednesday (15th) early evening. It’s clearly phrased a bit differently as we could if it was an NPOS letter, but I still think it’s very good letter at a very important time in the political process and together with a few more really important organisations. Best, Dagmar Von: Dagmar Urban Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2023 23:18 An: 'a.riekeberg(a)jpberlin.de' <a.riekeberg(a)jpberlin.de> Cc: npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de Betreff: AW: [Npos_2018] Proposal: NPOS to sign letter to EU Agri Ministers? Dear all, Thanks a lot for your first quick reactions! @Andreas, yes, you are correct, I’ll feed that into the proofreading process, thank you very much! Cheers, Dagmar Von: a.riekeberg(a)jpberlin.de<mailto:a.riekeberg@jpberlin.de> <a.riekeberg(a)jpberlin.de<mailto:a.riekeberg@jpberlin.de>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2023 11:18 An: Dagmar Urban <dagmar.urban(a)arche-noah.at<mailto:dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at>> Cc: npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de<mailto:npos_2018@testbiotech.de> Betreff: Re: [Npos_2018] Proposal: NPOS to sign letter to EU Agri Ministers? Dear all, yes, NPOS should sign. Question 1: is by the sentence "to enforce the ban on conventional seeds and plants" meant -> " to enforce the ban OF PATENTS on conventional seeds and plants"? Question 2: "The proposed report on the impact that the patenting of plants" -> "The proposed report on the impact OF the patenting of plants" Kind regards Andreas Am 24.10.2023 22:05, schrieb ARCHE NOAH Dagmar Urban: Dear all, We were asked by Global2000/Friends of the Earth if the NPOS coalition could sign a letter to the EU Agricultural ministers about patents. The letter has the debate in the Agri Council on New GMOs in November as the occasion for sending it, but covers both issues, patents on conventional seeds and patents on new GMOs. I commented on an earlier version of the letter, and sent it to Christoph for a first check. I think it would be great if NPOS signed, as so far we have very often two “divided” groups of organisations working on either patents on conventional seeds or on patents on New GMOs – and this time I think it’s a perfect opportunity to join forces for a strong joint letter reminding the Agri ministers of our demands. The (confidential) almost final version is available here – there will only be one more ending sentence added + someone will proofread it: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15Q8F3iatToyXdRRHLpAKRL5RHjQEzcS6tv3MTD1… If there are any major factual errors, those can of course still be changed. I have also attached a downloaded version for those of you boycotting Google. The aim of the letter is to have a short, 1 page high-level letter, with as little technical language as possible, signed by a few big and umbrella organisations (so NPOS, not individual NPOS members in our case; the same with IFOAM and Friends of the Earth, etc.), because of time constraints. Could you let the list know as soon as possible if you agree that NPOS should sign the letter or if you disagree? Thanks, Dagmar Dagmar Urban Team Saatgutpolitik/ Seed Policy Team ARCHE NOAH Gesellschaft für die Erhaltung der Kulturpflanzenvielfalt und ihre Entwicklung Obere Straße 40, A-3553 Schiltern +43 (0)676 /931 81 80 dagmar.urban(a)arche-noah.at<mailto:dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at> www.arche-noah.at<http://www.arche-noah.at/> ZVR 907994719 Die Vielfalt braucht einen sicheren Platz – jetzt spenden!<https://mitmachen.arche-noah.at/de/ihre-spende-zur-rettung-gef%C3%A4hrdeter…> PS: Kennen Sie schon den ARCHE NOAH Newsletter? Jetzt eine:r von 200.000 Newsletter-Abonnent:innen werden! Gleich hier<https://www.arche-noah.at/newsletter/newsletter-anmelden> anmelden und regelmäßig über Veranstaltungen, Projekte und Aktionen informiert werden _______________________________________________ Npos_2018 mailing list Npos_2018(a)testbiotech.de<mailto:Npos_2018@testbiotech.de> https://lists.testbiotech.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/npos_2018

1 0

further interesting findings from recently granted patents
by Christoph Then 09 Nov '23

09 Nov '23

Dear all I studied the file of the BASF patent as recently granted and reduced only to methods of selection (EP3742892). Disappointment: Article 53b was not discussed, only technical reasons. however, for the first time, I found a request that a patent should receive unitary effect (see attached foto). I guess for our next report (maybe earlier), we will research also other cases to find out which of the newly granted patents (or previously granted patents) may go along with similar requests. Then I turned my attention to another patent of KWS just recently granted and also reduced to the methods. However, in this case, it is a method for production, also encompassing the plants produced. Amongst these methods, there is also random mutagenesis (EP 3 447 134), a disclaimer is added. In this case, Art 53 b) was discussed and I found the statement as attached made by the examiners. After that, the claims directed to plants were deleted without further discussions. For me, this is an indication that the criteria for granting patents inheriting specific mutations is not yet settled inside the EPO. so let us keep pushing. cheers Christoph

1 0