Question about PR: Heineken co-withdraws patent?
Hi all,
Short but important question: I checked the patent again and it seems to belong to both Heineken and Carlsberg. https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP09801148 And the letter from Carlsberg says "the applicants", meaning it's both of them.
Thus, is it okay, if we talk of "Heineken and Carlsberg withdraw"... in the Arche Noah press release? We have a lot of Brauunion brands, with is owned by Heineken, but no relevant Carlsberg one, so it would make the PR much more relevant here.
Best, Dagmar
Dagmar Urban Interimistische Bereichsleiterin Politik / Interim Head of Policy
---------------------------------------------------------- PS: Das ARCHE NOAH Bildungsprogramm 2021 ist online: www.arche-noah.at/seminare! PPS: Die Vielfalt braucht einen sicheren Platz - jetzt spendenhttps://arche-noah.sicher-helfen.org/archenoah/gefrierkammer/?cf=www.
ARCHE NOAH - GESELLSCHAFT FÜR DIE ERHALTUNG DER KULTURPFLANZENVIELFALT UND IHRE ENTWICKLUNG Obere Straße 40, A-3553 Schiltern TEL.: +43 (0) 676 931 81 80 dagmar.urban@arche-noah.atmailto:dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at, www.arche-noah.athttp://www.arche-noah.at/ Schauen Sie doch mal auf unsere Webseitehttp://www.arche-noah.at/! [cid:image001.jpg@01D5C5FE.BDE05B60]
The letter was sent by Carlsberg. I guess Heineken is out of the game.
Thus, if we want to introduce Heineken we have to say something like that the patent that was applied by Carlsberg and Heineken now will get invalid (using for example last sentence in first para)
Am 03.11.21 um 08:57 schrieb ARCHE NOAH Dagmar Urban:
Hi all,
Short but important question: I checked the patent again and it seems to belong to both Heineken and Carlsberg.
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP09801148 https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP09801148
And the letter from Carlsberg says “the applicants”, meaning it’s both of them.
Thus, is it okay, if we talk of “Heineken and Carlsberg withdraw”… in the Arche Noah press release?
We have a lot of Brauunion brands, with is owned by Heineken, but no relevant Carlsberg one, so it would make the PR much more relevant here.
Best,
Dagmar
Dagmar Urban *Interimistische Bereichsleiterin Politik / Interim Head of Policy*
PS: Das ARCHE NOAH Bildungsprogramm 2021 ist online: *www.arche-noah.at/seminare* <www.arche-noah.at/seminare>*!*
PPS: Die Vielfalt braucht einen sicheren Platz – *jetzt spenden* https://arche-noah.sicher-helfen.org/archenoah/gefrierkammer/?cf=www*.*//
/ /
ARCHE NOAH - GESELLSCHAFT FÜR DIE ERHALTUNG DER KULTURPFLANZENVIELFALT UND IHRE ENTWICKLUNG Obere Straße 40, A-3553 Schiltern TEL.: +43 (0) 676 931 81 80 dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at mailto:dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at, www.arche-noah.at http://www.arche-noah.at/
*Schauen Sie doch mal auf unsere **Webseite* http://www.arche-noah.at/*!__*
cid:image001.jpg@01D5C5FE.BDE05B60
Npos_2018 mailing list Npos_2018@testbiotech.de https://lists.testbiotech.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/npos_2018
one more time: sorry, the letter was not sent by Carlsberg but by their patent attorneys. Officially, they represent both companies.
but I would stick to my proposal (how to mention Heineken) because it looks like we are not aware of further relevant patents filed by Heineken and most of the PR only mentiones Carlsberg.
but this is just a proposal which I think could help not to confuse the reader too much. Would have been better to consider Heineken from the beginning to introduce it properly. My fault.
Am 03.11.21 um 09:00 schrieb Christoph Then:
The letter was sent by Carlsberg. I guess Heineken is out of the game.
Thus, if we want to introduce Heineken we have to say something like that the patent that was applied by Carlsberg and Heineken now will get invalid (using for example last sentence in first para)
Am 03.11.21 um 08:57 schrieb ARCHE NOAH Dagmar Urban:
Hi all,
Short but important question: I checked the patent again and it seems to belong to both Heineken and Carlsberg.
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP09801148 https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP09801148
And the letter from Carlsberg says “the applicants”, meaning it’s both of them.
Thus, is it okay, if we talk of “Heineken and Carlsberg withdraw”… in the Arche Noah press release?
We have a lot of Brauunion brands, with is owned by Heineken, but no relevant Carlsberg one, so it would make the PR much more relevant here.
Best,
Dagmar
Dagmar Urban *Interimistische Bereichsleiterin Politik / Interim Head of Policy*
PS: Das ARCHE NOAH Bildungsprogramm 2021 ist online: *www.arche-noah.at/seminare* <www.arche-noah.at/seminare>*!*
PPS: Die Vielfalt braucht einen sicheren Platz – *jetzt spenden* https://arche-noah.sicher-helfen.org/archenoah/gefrierkammer/?cf=www*.*//
/ /
ARCHE NOAH - GESELLSCHAFT FÜR DIE ERHALTUNG DER KULTURPFLANZENVIELFALT UND IHRE ENTWICKLUNG Obere Straße 40, A-3553 Schiltern TEL.: +43 (0) 676 931 81 80 dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at mailto:dagmar.urban@arche-noah.at, www.arche-noah.at http://www.arche-noah.at/
*Schauen Sie doch mal auf unsere **Webseite* http://www.arche-noah.at/*!__*
cid:image001.jpg@01D5C5FE.BDE05B60
Npos_2018 mailing list Npos_2018@testbiotech.de https://lists.testbiotech.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/npos_2018
Npos_2018 mailing list Npos_2018@testbiotech.de https://lists.testbiotech.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/npos_2018
participants (3)
-
ARCHE NOAH Dagmar Urban -
Christoph Then -
Christoph Then