Yes, it looks, something went wrong: I have to work on it again. Sorry.

Am 20.04.20 um 08:58 schrieb Bram de Jonge:

Dear Christoph,

I just checked the document you sent last weekend. Please note that the text from Rijk Zwaan is NOT including their suggestions we received last Thursday. I have included it here again for your reference, see text in blue added to our original text in red. Best regards,

Bram

-----Original Message----- From: Npos_2018 npos_2018-bounces@testbiotech.de On Behalf Of Christoph Then Sent: Saturday, 18 April 2020 11:54 To: npos_2018@testbiotech.de Subject: [Npos_2018] final text elements inserted after Brams suggestions

Dear all

please see attached the final text elements I now would insert into the report in accordance with suggestions made by Bram:

1. the repsonse from Rijk: as suggested

2. the footnote on KWS: I had to change the wording from Bram. KWS does not comment on the decision of the AC (2017) but on the Technical Board.

Nevertheless, an interesting statement.

3. the co-inventor with KWS: I looked in all examples again, this seems to be the only missing co-inventor.

In addition, Johanna made some suggestions for details in editing. I all will now forward to layout.

Erling can you please insert the new passages as attached into the Danish version? After that please send the final Danish version and I will try to organise the layout. Thanks a lot!!

Cheers

Christoph