Hello all,
Thank for the great
work!
I find the second quote a bit too strong in terms of
suggesting they are doing illegal stuff ;) and Katherine had
this great suggestion of writing " "The EPO should act in
the public interest and honour the intention of EU patent
law".
If it goes it this
direction no one has taken it already, I could take it.
Also, in the EN
version only, one or several words seem to be wrong/missing
in the last para (DE is fine).
No Patents on
Seeds! believes this could
be a model law for national patent legislation in other
countries. And as guidance for
the
clarification the should be brought forward by the
Administrative Council. (maybe “And also act as a guidance
for the clarifying decisions expected to be taken/brought
forward be the Administrative Council”?)
Keine Patente auf Saatgut! sieht
in diesem Gesetz eine Vorlage für andere nationale
Patentgesetze und für die erwarteten Entscheidungen des
Verwaltungsrats.
Best,
Dagmar
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Npos_2018 <npos_2018-bounces@testbiotech.de> Im
Auftrag von Christoph Then
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Juni 2023 16:29
An: npos_2018@testbiotech.de
Betreff: [Npos_2018] some edits on our media release for
next week (de and en)
Dear all
the English native speaker and Axel
already sent their comments.
please see amended versions. We are
still looking for somebody to take
the second quote.
cheers
Christoph